Editorial and Sourcing Policy
Effective 1 August 2026
This policy defines how changing admission information is researched, labelled and corrected. It is designed to keep advice traceable to the document that supports it.
Source hierarchy
- Government counselling, examination and regulatory authorities.
- The institution's official prospectus, fee notice, disclosure or placement report.
- Other primary records that identify the issuing organisation and period.
Aggregator pages are not used as proof for fees, cut-offs or placement outcomes.
Years, dates and missing fields
A changing figure should carry its academic year or counselling cycle. A publication or update date appears only when that work actually occurred. If a necessary figure is not verified, the working copy uses [FIGURE MISSING]; pages with unresolved markers should remain out of search indexing until they meet the publishing gate.
Recommendations and comparisons
Comparisons separate documented facts from calculations and user-entered scenarios. Highest-package claims are not treated as a typical outcome. Unknown values are not replaced with invented industry averages. Counselling suitability depends on the student's route, score, category, domicile, budget and goals.
People and review credits
A visible author identifies who prepared the page. Hritik Ranjan reviews every page for factual accuracy before its initial publication, and the visible credit must match the page-level reviewedBy structured data. Testimonials, star ratings and aggregate-review schema are not created without a verifiable public source.
Corrections
Send the page URL, disputed statement and supporting official document to [email protected]. A corrected page receives a new modified date only when its substantive content changes.